



Data from Statista, and Business of Apps shows the dating app industry is still growing. User numbers are up, engagement is consistent, and virtual dating has become standard behaviour. The average user spends around 10 hours a week on these apps.
Revenue projections suggest the market will keep expanding through 2028 and beyond. This means the niche has real opportunity but only if you build something that doesn't trap users in shallow swipe loops.
Most dating apps fail because they copy surface-level features without thinking about user psychology or long-term retention. If you're planning to build a dating app, you need to start with clarity about the type of experience you want to create and the audience you're targeting.
The dating app market has climbed steadily since the early 2010s. People have become comfortable using apps for discovery and conversations. Activity levels suggest users aren't leaving the space.
Year-over-year increases in both users and revenue show that the industry has matured into a stable sector. This stability matters because it means you're not entering a speculative bubble. You're entering a space where user behaviour is established and predictable.
Growth doesn't guarantee success. Users are active, but they're also quick to leave if something feels wrong. The difference between a successful app and one that dies in six months often comes down to understanding user expectations. People know what good matching feels like. They know what intuitive navigation looks like. They've tried multiple apps, so they have benchmarks.
Your app will be judged against Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, and others, whether you like it or not. This means you can't get away with unclear value propositions, or features that feel half-built.
Choosing the type depends on your target audience, the problem you're solving, and how much control you want over the matching process.
These match users based on proximity. The model works because people prefer connecting locally. But it requires density. Without enough users in one area, the experience feels empty.
Start with one region instead of trying to scale globally right away. Geolocation apps are popular in cities where population density is high and people are open to meeting strangers nearby.
The challenge with this model is cold start.
Getting enough users in one location to make the app useful. If someone opens the app and sees only three profiles within 50 miles, they won't come back.
This is why many geolocation apps launch with heavy localized marketing in one or two cities before expanding. The other challenge is safety. When you're matching people based on location, privacy concerns cannot be ignored. Users don't want their details (profile) to be public and they expect a proper reporting and blocking systems.
Users answer questions, they can improve matching, but onboarding should be simple. Too many questions and users drop. And, too few and the matching may not work. The best questionnaire apps balance depth with brevity.
Some apps use progressive profiling. Start with a few questions and add more over time.
The other advantage of questionnaire-based apps is that they attract users who are serious about finding compatible matches.
People willing to answer 30 questions about their values and relationship goals are usually more invested than those who just want to swipe through photos.
A straightforward profile catalogue with minimal filtering. Users browse freely. This model depends on clean navigation, if the directory feels cluttered, people stop exploring. Open directories work well for niche communities where users want to see everyone in the network without algorithmic interference.
The downside is that it requires active user behaviour. There's no algorithm pushing profiles to users, so engagement depends entirely on how motivated people are to browse. This model also works better for smaller, tightly defined communities rather than mass-market apps.
Apps built for shared interest groups (like fitness enthusiasts, pet owners, etc.). Since users already have common ground, conversations is easier. Niche apps have stronger retention because users feel like the app was built for them specifically.
The challenge with niche apps is market size. You're narrowing your audience, so you need to validate that the niche is large enough to sustain the app.
Some niches are too small to support a standalone app, but they can work as features within a broader platform.
Once you know the type, decide how you want to build it. The choice is between custom or white-label. Both have clear trade-offs, and the right choice depends on your budget, timeline, and how much control you need over the product.

You build from scratch. This usually takes 7 to 12 months and requires either an in-house team or outsourcing. Custom development is the best choice when you need full control over the app. However, it comes with high costs and long timelines.
If your idea is similar to existing apps, custom might not be worth it. Custom development is the right choice when you are planning to build something unique, non-generic application.
Custom apps give you full control, but they also mean you're responsible for maintaining and updating the entire codebase. As your app scales, you'll need developers who understand your specific architecture. This can become expensive over time.
White-label apps are prebuilt. You get a ready solution and adjust branding, colors, and some flow elements. Deep customization is limited because the core is already built. You also can't change the tech stack.
But it's faster and cheaper for launching or testing ideas. Several companies offer white-label dating app (or pre-built app). You can request a demo.
It's a good option if your app idea is similar to existing dating apps. The main limitation is you're working within the constraints of the prebuilt platform, so if you need something highly customised, you might hit a wall.
For most dating apps, the standard features in a white-label solution are enough to validate the concept and build an initial user base.
If you're unsure, a software consultation is a good idea. Brilworks offers free discovery calls to help you map out requirements and decide whether custom or white-label is the better fit.
These are the essential components in a white-label dating app or the baseline of what users expect.
Users log in through Facebook, Google, or similar options. This keeps onboarding fast. Social login also reduces friction because users don't need to remember another password. The downside is privacy concernsm some users don't want to connect their dating profile to their social accounts.
Offering both social login and traditional email signup gives users flexibility.
Users add hobbies, values, photos, and other details. If they connect social accounts, some information imports automatically. So encouraging users to fill out their profiles is critical.
The algorithm blends behaviour patterns, and mathematical logic. Good matching logic is the difference between an app that feels random and one that feels intentional. Users notice when matches are consistently irrelevant, and they leave.
If you want a purely location-based version, that's available as a prebuilt setup. Location-based matching is straightforward to implement and works well for apps targeting local connections.
These features keep the app feeling active and users involved. Engagement is critical because dating apps live or die based on daily active users.
Includes badges, boosts, and virtual gifts. These add a layer of interaction beyond messaging. Gamification works because it gives users small wins and reasons to return. It also creates opportunities for monetization, users can pay for boosts or premium features to increase visibility.
A feed-style section where users post photos, videos, or updates. Feeds increase engagement because they give users something to do besides swiping, like commenting on posts or reacting to updates, which lowers the barrier to interaction.
Voice and video features are important after 2020 when in-person meetings were harder to arrange. Even now, many users prefer a video call before committing to a date. It's a safety and comfort feature.
Backend features that handle operations and safety. These aren't visible to users, but they're essential for running the app smoothly.
Notifications drive re-engagement, but they need to be managed carefully. Too many notifications and users turn them off or uninstall the app.
Controls for managing user accounts, content moderation, and app settings. A good admin panel lets you remove fake profiles, ban abusive users, and adjust app parameters without developer intervention.
Basic data protection and safety systems included in the core package. Security is non-negotiable for dating apps.
If you're building a dating app and need to choose between custom or prebuilt, Brilworks has worked on 150+ projects. We handle both white-label and custom development based on what your project requires.
Get In Touch
Contact us for your software development requirements
Get In Touch
Contact us for your software development requirements