



React Native app development is widely known for its speed, flexibility, and cross-platform capabilities. Yet, like any framework, it has its limitations. In this article, we will explore the real-world React Native limitations that developers and founders need to know, address common misconceptions, and provide guidance on when React Native is the right choice for a project.
React Native has maintained its promise of “learn once, write anywhere,” enabling developers to build apps that run across iOS and Android. Many businesses still choose React Native development for their mobile projects. However, even high-profile apps face challenges.
Choose a react native app development company that prioritizes fast delivery and flexible features. Hire expert, vetted React Native developers from Brilworks to build your next mobile app.
For instance, Airbnb, once a prominent React Native success story, retired the framework in 2018 when the drawbacks of cross-platform development began outweighing its benefits.
Recognizing these limitations upfront is critical to making informed decisions about React Native app development. This guide explores performance constraints, maintenance challenges, and common misconceptions to help teams anticipate hurdles and plan resilient, future-proof apps.

Before we dive in, it is important to clarify that React Native is not a flawed framework. As a React Native app development company, we have seen its immense potential. However, it is not a magic solution for every project. From our experience and the broader developer community, certain limitations consistently appear.
We have also compared React Native with other frameworks like React Native vs Flutter, React Native vs Ionic, and React Native vs Electron to guide teams toward better decisions.
We categorize the limitations into two main areas:
Performance & Native Code Requirements
Development & Maintenance Complexity
While React Native is the preferred choice for cross-platform development, it can struggle in scenarios that demand high performance or deep hardware integration.
Here are the key areas where limitations arise:
Battery usage is often overlooked. React Native runs on a JavaScript engine, which means background processes can consume more power than native apps. Developers have reported noticeable battery drain after converting native apps to React Native, which can be a problem for apps with frequent background activity or real-time features.
High-performance interfaces, like rendering large media-rich lists, can push React Native beyond its comfort zone. Even with libraries such as FlashList, JavaScript-side rendering has limits. In such cases, native modules or a fully native approach may be necessary.
Lower-end Android devices can experience lag when running complex views or animations. Even with optimizations like Hermes, performance issues persist, affecting user experience and retention in regions where budget devices are common.
Features such as custom camera modules, Bluetooth integration, or sensor arrays often require native code. React Native can handle much of the work, but developers may still need Swift, Kotlin, or Objective-C modules for full functionality.
React Native primarily runs on three threads: JavaScript, shadow (layout), and native. This model can be a bottleneck for compute-intensive tasks or apps requiring real-time responsiveness, unlike native development, which offers more flexible thread management.
Earlier performance issues were linked to the “bridge,” which connects JavaScript with native code. Innovations such as Reanimated v2 and the JavaScript Interface (JSI) have improved performance, especially for animations. Still, edge-case bugs can appear when using custom gestures or animation libraries.
React Native apps tend to have larger binaries than fully native apps, which matters for users with limited storage or slower connections. While not critical for all projects, it is an important factor to consider.
Also read: React Native Performance Optimization Tips for Scalable Apps
Beyond performance, React Native development brings challenges for building and maintaining apps at scale:
React Native relies heavily on third-party libraries, often maintained by the open-source community rather than Meta. Core features like navigation or gestures are external dependencies. Outdated or conflicting packages can slow development.
Despite its cross-platform promise, developers still need platform familiarity, especially with iOS, for debugging, customizing behavior, or writing native code. This often requires training or hiring developers who can navigate both JavaScript and native environments.
Updating React Native versions can be challenging. Changes in native configurations or third-party dependencies can break builds, making some teams postpone upgrades.
React Native relies on iOS, Android, Xcode, Gradle, and other tools. Updates to these systems can break builds and require additional maintenance to ensure stability.
The React Native codebase is complex. Edge-case bugs, particularly after OS updates, can be time-consuming to resolve without deep knowledge of native code.
Integrating third-party SDKs in React Native can be complicated due to conflicts between CocoaPods, Swift Package Manager, or the React Native bridge. Native development often provides smoother integration in these cases.
In 2025, React Native continues to evolve with features like Hermes, Reanimated 2, and JSI. However, certain limitations remain for high-performance or feature-heavy apps.”

React Native is sometimes misunderstood. Let’s clear up common myths:
Performance issues mainly occur in apps with high computational complexity. Libraries like FlashList and Reanimated 2 keep most apps running smoothly.
While React Native covers a lot, advanced features may still require native modules. Tools like Expo reduce, but do not eliminate, this need.
React Native has been used in production for years by companies like Meta, Shopify, and Microsoft. It is mature enough for real-world applications when limitations are understood.
While it accelerates MVP development (strong choice for MVPs), React Native can support long-term products with strategic native integrations.
The ecosystem has matured. Most widely used libraries are actively maintained, though developers must take ownership when issues arise.
-1749714315914.webp)
Despite limitations, React Native remains practical for many projects:
Code can be shared between iOS and Android, reducing development effort and speeding up delivery.
Hot reload and familiar JavaScript syntax allow faster bug fixes and feature updates.
Support from Meta, companies like Software Mansion and Callstack, and a large open-source community provide ready solutions for common challenges.
Hybrid approach allows optimization in specific areas without going fully native.
Fewer developers can manage apps for both platforms, reducing overall development and maintenance costs.
Also read:Benefits of React Native
React Native comes with challenges, from performance constraints on low-end devices to occasional native code requirements. Understanding these limitations helps teams make informed decisions and avoid pitfalls.
For many products targeting multiple platforms, the benefits, shared codebase, faster development, strong community support, and cost efficiency, outweigh the drawbacks. Knowing where React Native fits best allows teams to leverage its strengths while planning for its limitations.
If you are considering React Native development for your next project or facing challenges in your current app, evaluating these limitations is the first step toward a more resilient, scalable solution.
React Native apps can struggle with performance on complex UI screens, advanced animations, and low-end Android devices. Native development may be better for demanding use cases.
It depends. React Native works well for many mid-to-large apps, but performance, third-party SDK integration, and native code requirements can become bottlenecks at scale.
Frequent updates, dependency management, and OS/tooling changes can lead to breakages. Staying up-to-date while ensuring stability often requires native expertise.
Not directly. You may need to write custom native modules for advanced hardware access, like Bluetooth, sensors, or background services.
Because it allows faster development, shared codebases, and solid community support, making it a great fit for MVPs, cross-platform apps, and startup budgets.
Get In Touch
Contact us for your software development requirements
Get In Touch
Contact us for your software development requirements