Did you know that Microsoft is among the biggest users of React Native for cross-platform development? At Qcon London, DevClass asked a Microsoft senior software engineer why they use this approach to cross-platform development, despite having home-grown alternatives.
That said, we are all aware of the popularity and preference of React Native for mobile app development. Electron, on the other hand, is the go-to choice for cross-platform desktop app development. So these two compare for app development?
In this guide, we will break down the differences between React Native vs Electron, exploring their strengths, use cases, and limitations, and help you decide which one best fits your product, team, and goals.
Before comparing the two, it’s important to understand what React Native and Electron are designed to do—and more importantly, what they’re not.
React Native is a JavaScript framework developed by Meta that allows developers to build mobile applications for both iOS and Android using a single codebase. It bridges the gap between web development and native app development by letting you write your UI in JavaScript and React, while still rendering native components under the hood.
React Native is ideal for teams focused on mobile-first development who want to build apps that feel and perform like native ones, without maintaining separate codebases for each platform.
Electron is an open-source framework created by GitHub that allows developers to build desktop applications for multiple operating systems using familiar web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It essentially packages a Chromium browser and a Node.js runtime, allowing developers to run web-based apps as native desktop software across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Electron is particularly useful for web developers who want to leverage their existing skills to build desktop software.
That said, while there's growing curiosity around Electron for mobile use, it's not optimized for mobile environments and is best suited for desktop use cases.
For teams building mobile apps with performance, scalability, and development efficiency in mind, React Native brings several key advantages to the table.
React Native is the perfect choice for cross-platform app development among developers. It lets developers write once and deploy across both major mobile platforms. Using a single codebase makes maintenance easier, speeds up development, and ensures smoother updates across platforms.
Unlike hybrid webview-based solutions, React Native renders native UI components, resulting in smoother performance and a more responsive user experience. This makes it a strong choice for apps where responsiveness and fluid UI interactions are critical. Furthermore, the vast React Native UI libraries also aid developers in creating a native-like interface.
Backed by Meta and a large open-source community, React Native offers robust third-party libraries, pre-built components, and continuous updates. This reduces the time needed to build common app features and ensures long-term framework viability.
React Native is built on React and JavaScript, technologies familiar to most front-end developers. Teams can transition into mobile app development without a steep learning curve, making it easier to scale engineering teams and share talent across web and mobile.
Need to access device hardware, Bluetooth, or custom animations? React Native supports native modules written in Swift, Java, or Kotlin, offering flexibility for performance-critical or platform-specific features without having to abandon the cross-platform codebase.
If your focus is on building cross-platform desktop app, Electron offers several compelling advantages.
With Electron, you can build applications for Windows, macOS, and Linux using a single codebase. This makes it a top choice for teams aiming to ship desktop software quickly across multiple platforms without duplicating effort.
Electron leverages familiar technologies—HTML, CSS, and JavaScript—making it easy for web developers to transition into desktop app development. You don’t need to learn platform-specific desktop APIs to deliver a fully functional app.
Because Electron allows rapid iteration using web development workflows, it's ideal for early-stage product development, MVPs, and internal tools. Teams can move quickly from concept to release without the overhead of traditional desktop frameworks.
Electron apps run with a bundled Node.js runtime, giving developers direct access to the file system, system processes, and native OS-level APIs—something that isn’t possible in a typical web browser environment. This makes it suitable for building rich, fully-featured desktop experiences.
Electron allows access to native operating system features such as notifications, tray icons, menu bars, and file system operations, enabling rich desktop experiences that feel native to users.
Both React Native and Electron are designed to simplify cross-platform development, but they cater to fundamentally different needs. One is designed specifically for building mobile applications, while the other is best suited for creating desktop software. Below is a breakdown of how they compare across core criteria.
React Native is purpose-built for developing near native mobile applications, most popular for cross-platform development. It enables developers to write on a codebase in JavaScript (or TypeScript) and deploy it to both iOS and Android. The framework uses native UI elements, allowing the app to function and feel like a true native application on each platform.
In contrast, Electron is specifically designed for desktop applications. It lets you develop cross-platform desktop applications for Windows, macOS, and Linux using familiar web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Electron apps bundle Chromium and Node.js, allowing access to native OS-level APIs while rendering the UI like a web app.
React Native uses native UI components, which means apps look and feel like platform-specific experiences. This is a key advantage if you are aiming for a polished UX that matches mobile users' expectations
Electron wraps a web app in a Chromium shell, so the UI is essentially rendered using HTML and CSS. While this provides flexibility, it lacks the truly native look and feel unless heavily customized.
Electron apps are known for being heavy on resources, mainly because they bundle Chromium and Node.js. This leads to higher memory and CPU usage, even for relatively simple apps.
In contrast, React Native for Windows is reported to offer better performance, especially when optimized. Because it uses native UI components and doesn’t rely on a web engine, apps can run leaner and behave more like traditional native software.
React Native leverages React and JavaScript, making it accessible to front-end developers, but it still requires some knowledge of native mobile environments for advanced use cases (e.g., Bluetooth, camera access).
Electron allows developers to build desktop apps using pure web technologies. If your team is already familiar with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, getting started requires little additional learning. Plus, with Node.js integration, you can interact with the file system and OS-level APIs without jumping into C++ or platform-native languages.
React Native bridges JavaScript with native mobile APIs, but for custom functionality, developers may need to write native modules in Java or Swift. This adds complexity but enables deep integration with device hardware.
Electron gives you direct access to native desktop APIs through Node.js, which makes it easier to tap into OS-level features like system tray, notifications, auto-updates, or clipboard access.
While both frameworks can be used with React, their integration experience differs. Electron doesn’t come with built-in React support—you'll need to configure your own tooling (like Webpack or Vite) or use a boilerplate. This setup can feel disjointed and “hacky” to some.
React Native, being created by Meta, is built around React from the ground up. The mobile experience is smooth, but once you move to desktop, additional complexity arises due to native bindings and the need to work across different operating systems.
This is one of the clearest differentiators. Electron is focused entirely on cross-platform desktop apps, supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux. Although there's interest in using Electron for mobile, it wasn't designed with mobile platforms in mind.
React Native, on the other hand, is primarily aimed at mobile development but also offers experimental support for desktop platforms. This makes it more flexible if you want to use a single codebase across mobile and (eventually) desktop—but keep in mind the limitations of its desktop maturity.
React Native enjoys backing from Meta and a huge open-source community. There is a wealth of plugins, libraries, and tools that accelerate mobile development.
Electron is also well-supported, with major contributors like GitHub and Slack. While its ecosystem is smaller than React Native's, it's rich enough for most desktop use cases, and continues to grow.
When evaluating frameworks for cross-platform development, it helps to look at the real-world products that are already using them. Both React Native and Electron have been adopted by major companies to build high-performing aps across mobile and desktop platforms. These popular examples highlight how each framework is used in practice. Below are some well-known apps built with each technology, offering insight into where they perform best.
The right choice between React Native vs Electron largely depends on your app's platform focus, user expectations, and the development roadmap. Both frameworks enable cross-platform development, but they excel in different scenarios.
React Native is purpose-built for mobile. If your primary goal is to launch a high-quality mobile app on both iOS and Android, React Native offers a strong balance of performance, native UI components, and developer productivity. It’s a smart fit for:
Mobile-first applications that need native device capabilities (camera, sensors, GPS)
Consumer-facing apps where UX and performance are crucial
Teams looking to reuse code across Android and iOS
Companies planning future desktop support through React Native for Windows or macOS
While there is growing support for desktop platforms, React Native's strength still lies in mobile. So if you are comparing Electron for mobile use cases, React Native is generally the more appropriate tool.
If you are building a cross-platform desktop app, Electron is often the default choice. It's designed for desktop-first development, enabling teams to create apps for Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single codebase. Ideal use cases include:
Productivity tools and communication platforms
Desktop versions of existing web applications
Apps that need system-level features like tray menus, file access, or native notifications
Developer-focused software like IDEs or documentation tools
Building exceptional mobile apps requires more than just technical expertise—it demands a partner who understands your vision and can bring it to life across platforms seamlessly.
As a leading React Native app development company, Brilworks specializes in creating high-performance, cross-platform mobile applications that deliver native-like experiences without the complexity of maintaining separate codebases. Our team doesn't just write code; we architect solutions that align with your business objectives and scale with your growth.
Strategic Technology Partnerships: We guide startups, SMBs, and enterprise teams through every aspect of mobile app development, from initial concept to market launch and beyond.
Cross-Platform Excellence: Whether you need a React Native mobile app that performs flawlessly on iOS and Android, or desktop solutions that integrate seamlessly with native systems, we ensure your technology choices support your long-term success.
Architecture-First Approach: We make critical architectural decisions from day one, preventing costly redesigns and ensuring your app can evolve with your business needs.
End-to-End Solutions: From MVP development to enterprise-scale applications, our React Native expertise covers the full spectrum of mobile app development challenges.
Are you excited to bring your mobile app vision to life? Partner with Brilworks and experience the difference that strategic development makes.
React Native vs Electron is not a rivalry; they both are specialists in their own domains. One is engineered to fit in your pocket, the other thrives on the desktop. React Native puts your app in people's hands; Electron puts it on their desks. Understanding that distinction is where good technical decisions begin.
If you are building something meant to move with the user, for example, a ride-sharing app, a health tracker, or a social platform, React Native gives you a native feel and mobile performance. But if you are crafting tools meant to sit open for hours, like productivity apps, design tools, or communication platforms, Electron offers reach, speed of development, and proven success at scale.
In the end, it's not just about what you can build with each, it's about what each framework enables you to do best.
React Native is primarily used for building mobile apps for iOS and Android using JavaScript and native components. Electron, on the other hand, is designed for creating cross-platform desktop applications using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
No, Electron is not intended for mobile app development. It’s built for desktop platforms like Windows, macOS, and Linux. If you're targeting mobile devices, React Native is the better choice.
For mobile apps, React Native typically offers better performance because it compiles to native components. For desktop apps, Electron can be more resource-intensive but offers fast development and broad OS support.
Electron is often seen as easier to set up, especially for web developers, since it uses familiar tools like Node.js and Chromium. React Native has a steeper learning curve due to platform-specific challenges and native integrations.
Popular React Native apps include Instagram, Discord (mobile), and Shopify. Electron powers desktop apps like Visual Studio Code, Slack, and Figma.
Get In Touch
Contact us for your software development requirements
Get In Touch
Contact us for your software development requirements